Accuracy
SAJE
PND
## Percent Non-Overlapping Data
##
## Case PND Total Exceeds
## Case1 100% 3 3
##
## Mean : 100 %Tau-U
Parker (2011) Version
## Tau-U
## Method: complete
##
## Overall Tau-U:
## Model Tau_U se z df p
## A vs. B NaN Inf NaN 0 NaN
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.745 0.199 3.75 0 0.000177
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.596 0.288 2.07 0 0.038549
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.600 0.286 2.10 0 0.036054
##
## $Case1
## kendall k_p n pairs pos neg ties S D Tau SD_S VAR_S
## A vs. B 0.775 0.0809 6 9 9 0 0 9 9.0 1.000 4.58 21.00
## Trend A -0.333 0.2963 3 3 1 2 0 -1 3.0 -0.333 1.91 3.67
## Trend B -0.333 0.2963 3 3 1 2 0 -1 3.0 -0.333 1.91 3.67
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.745 0.0700 6 12 11 1 0 10 13.4 0.745 4.97 24.67
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.596 0.1587 6 12 10 2 0 8 13.4 0.596 4.97 24.67
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.600 0.1329 6 15 12 3 0 9 15.0 0.600 5.32 28.33
## SE_Tau Z p
## A vs. B 0.509 1.964 0.0495
## Trend A 0.638 -0.522 0.6015
## Trend B 0.638 -0.522 0.6015
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.370 2.013 0.0441
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.370 1.611 0.1072
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.355 1.691 0.0909Tarlow (2016) Version
This calculation is based on Kendalls Tau
## Baseline corrected tau
##
## Auto correlation in baseline:
## tau = -0.33; p = 0.296
##
## Baseline corrected tau:
## tau = 0.77; p = 0.081
##
## Baseline correction not applied.LELI
PND
## Percent Non-Overlapping Data
##
## Case PND Total Exceeds
## Case1 100% 3 3
##
## Mean : 100 %Tau-U
Parker (2011) Version
## Tau-U
## Method: complete
##
## Overall Tau-U:
## Model Tau_U se z df p
## A vs. B NaN Inf NaN 0 NaN
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.794 0.140 5.68 0 1.38e-08
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.713 0.186 3.83 0 1.27e-04
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.786 0.145 5.43 0 5.55e-08
##
## $Case1
## kendall k_p n pairs pos neg ties S D Tau SD_S VAR_S
## A vs. B 0.732 0.03689 8 15 15 0 0 15 15.0 1.000 6.71 45.00
## Trend A -0.600 0.08641 5 10 2 8 0 -6 10.0 -0.600 4.08 16.67
## Trend B 0.333 1.00000 3 3 2 1 0 1 3.0 0.333 1.91 3.67
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.794 0.01087 8 25 23 2 0 21 26.5 0.794 7.85 61.67
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.713 0.03154 8 18 17 1 0 16 22.4 0.713 6.98 48.67
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.786 0.00937 8 28 25 3 0 22 28.0 0.786 8.08 65.33
## SE_Tau Z p
## A vs. B 0.447 2.236 0.02535
## Trend A 0.408 -1.470 0.14164
## Trend B 0.638 0.522 0.60151
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.297 2.674 0.00749
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.311 2.294 0.02182
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.289 2.722 0.00649Tarlow (2016) Version
This calculation is based on Kendalls Tau
## Baseline corrected tau
##
## Auto correlation in baseline:
## tau = -0.6; p = 0.086
##
## Baseline corrected tau:
## tau = 0.73; p = 0.037
##
## Baseline correction not applied.GIAD
PND
## Percent Non-Overlapping Data
##
## Case PND Total Exceeds
## Case1 33.33% 3 1
##
## Mean : 33.33 %Tau-U
Parker (2011) Version
## Tau-U
## Method: complete
##
## Overall Tau-U:
## Model Tau_U se z df p
## A vs. B 0.500 0.306 1.63 0 0.102
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.411 0.339 1.21 0 0.225
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.394 0.345 1.14 0 0.253
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.429 0.333 1.29 0 0.198
##
## $Case1
## kendall k_p n pairs pos neg ties S D Tau SD_S VAR_S SE_Tau
## A vs. B 0.378 0.377 7 12 9 3 0 6 12.0 0.500 5.66 32.00 0.471
## Trend A -0.333 0.308 4 6 2 4 0 -2 6.0 -0.333 2.94 8.67 0.491
## Trend B 0.333 1.000 3 3 2 1 0 1 3.0 0.333 1.91 3.67 0.638
## A vs. B - Trend A 0.411 0.272 7 18 13 5 0 8 19.4 0.411 6.38 40.67 0.328
## A vs. B + Trend B 0.394 0.315 7 15 11 4 0 7 17.7 0.394 5.97 35.67 0.336
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 0.429 0.230 7 21 15 6 0 9 21.0 0.429 6.66 44.33 0.317
## Z p
## A vs. B 1.061 0.289
## Trend A -0.679 0.497
## Trend B 0.522 0.602
## A vs. B - Trend A 1.255 0.210
## A vs. B + Trend B 1.172 0.241
## A vs. B + Trend B - Trend A 1.352 0.176Tarlow (2016) Version
This calculation is based on Kendalls Tau
## Baseline corrected tau
##
## Auto correlation in baseline:
## tau = -0.33; p = 0.308
##
## Baseline corrected tau:
## tau = 0.38; p = 0.377
##
## Baseline correction not applied.
